论文部分内容阅读
在唐代制度化的身言書判試,隨着政治更革及實際運作中的不斷滌蕩,逐漸失其實,繼而亦失其名。宋真宗因大赦之慣例,復用身言書判之名,對選人施筒拔之恩,已與唐代性質不同。應試選人或藉此改官,或因之循資。後因士大夫們對身言書判試頗多非議,這一考試科目終至熙寧變法時遭廢。表面看來,唐宋身言書判試之實行,徒爲考試形式之因革,實際上,其興廢抑揚,折射出由唐到宋政治、社會及多種制度之流變過程。這一過程又充分反映出,唐宋時期在選任官員中以“經世致用”爲主導的不同取材標準和理念同實際考試運作之間的張力與磨合。
In the Tang dynasty, the institutionalized testimony of the words of the book was gradually lost as the politics were changed and the actual operation was being fooled, and then lost its name. Because of the general practice of Amnesty, Song Zhenzong rebukes the name of the Book of Songs and says that it is different from the nature of the Tang Dynasty in choosing the best candidate. Candidates should be candidates for reformation or because of this. After the doctors and scholars made a lot of criticism on the testimony of the testimony, the subject of the examination was finally scrapped Xuning change. On the face of it, the implementation of the Book of Songs and Bodhisattva Bodhisattva, the only test for the form of leather, in fact, the rise and fall of oppression, reflects the political, social and multi-system change from Tang to Song. This process fully reflects the tensions and conflicts between the different standards and concepts of the selection of materials and the actual examination operation among the elected officials in the Tang and Song dynasties.