《民法通则》及其他一些民法在对无主物品的界定及这些无主物品的归属权的规定上有一定的模糊性,从而也就导致了在现实生活中出现了很多物权纠纷的案件。在《民法通则》中对无主物品的界定上存在的问题有相关概念模糊、界定程序不规范、无主物的归属权公示制度不完善等,这是在无主物品的界定和归属权中存在的主要问题。针对这些情况需要不断完善和改进相关法律条文,使法律条文更加准确、有效,更好解决现实中的物权纠纷问题。 The “General Principles of Civil Law” and other civil laws have some ambiguities in the definition of non-host items and the ownership of these non-host items, thus leading to many cases of real-property disputes that have arisen in real life. In the “General Rules of Civil Law”, the definition of ownershipless subjects has the related concepts of fuzzy concepts, non-standard definition procedures and the lack of the system of publicity of the ownership of non-essential things. There are major problems. In view of these situations, we need to constantly improve and improve the relevant legal provisions so as to make the legal provisions more accurate and effective and to better solve the real estate property disputes.