统考有全国的,全省的,地、县的,乡镇的,还有各个学校的.这些统考在录取人材,摸清教学底子等方面曾起了一定的作用.但有些领导同志以统考来代替深入细致的检查督促,却是不可取的,把统考成绩作为衡量教师工作好环的唯一依据,那就更不对了,而且滥用统考还会打乱正常的教学秩序.某乡教育组几乎期期都搞统考,并渐渐以统考来代替深入细致的检查工作.去年下期期末就干脆不查作业,不查教案,不听课了,全凭一次统考决雌雄.层层搞统考,把统考当作督促教师教、学生学的主要手段,实践证明会产生不良后果.且不说由 There are national, provincial, county, township, and various schools. These examinations have played a role in recruiting talented people and clarifying the basics of teaching. However, some leading comrades replace them with unified examinations. In-depth and meticulous inspection and supervision is not desirable, and it is even more wrong to regard the results of the unified examination as the sole basis for measuring the quality of teachers’ work. Moreover, the abuse of the unified examination will disrupt the normal teaching order. They all took the examinations and gradually replaced the examinations with meticulous examinations. At the end of last year’s next year, they simply did not check homework, did not search for teaching plans, and did not listen to lectures. Teacher teaching, the main means of student learning, practice has proved to have negative consequences.