台湾地区的公证人在办理公证事项时,房屋租赁契约一直是比例很重的项目(见表一),原因无非是租约公证除了对于“租金债权”之给付可以经由当事人预先之合意,约定径受强制执行外,就期限届至的“房屋”返还,亦能够透过公权力介入直接进行强制执行,无须经过冗长的诉讼程序,即得将房屋收回。然而大陆地区的法律规定对于房屋返还部分,尚存有争议。本文拟从两岸公证的相异点进行分析,主要探讨公证事项的范围、强制执行事项的范围、何人可提起执行声请、 Notarization of Taiwan’s notary in the handling of notarization, the lease contract has always been a very large proportion of the project (see Table I), the reason is nothing more than a notarization of the lease, in addition to the “rent claims” of the payment can be subject to the parties prior to the desired agreement With the enforcement of the law, the return of “housing” to the expiry of the deadline can also be directly enforced through the intervention of public power and the house can be recovered without lengthy proceedings. However, the legal provisions in mainland China for the return part of the house, there are still controversial. This article intends to analyze the differences between the two sides of the notary public, mainly discussing the scope of notarization issues, the scope of enforcement issues,