Analyse an Authentic Spoken Text from the Viewpoint of Conversation Analysis

来源 :校园英语·下旬 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:liuqingq
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
  Transcription of Herman and Brett’s Conversation (Authentic Materials)
  Text: (H = Herman, B = Brett)
  1. B: Yah= =erm(.) let gonna try to (0.2)avoid the::(0.4) Ring of red
  (0.8)
  2. H: Avoid the ring of fire:::
  (0.6)
  3. B: It’s good hmm(.)man?
  (0.3)
  4. H: Think?
  5. B: Yah.yah(0.1)It’s not that hot
  (0.5)
  6. H: Hmm
  (1.8)
  7. B: Hmm
  (0.2)
  8. H:I guess you’re right
  (2.5)
  9. B: Can’t wait to get down to Nan Ning(.) man…
  (0.1)
  10. H: Yah?
  (0.1)
  11. B: Yah yah::
  12. H: HeHh heHh heHh :::What’s Nan Ning?
  (0.2)
  13. B: The:: er. temperature is-s-w- warmer Hh (.)I want some “like” 14.tropical weather(.) you know
  15. H: HeHh heHh heHh heHh(.) Is there surfing there?
  16. B: I don’t think so(.) I(.)I’ll have to go to==er(.) Hong Kong?
  17. H: Oh
  18. B: Catch some wave//s?
  19. H: Are you sure Hong Kong has wa//ves?
  20. B: Ya ya the(.)well:: 21. (.)I don’t know. I went on the ::Internet ?and 21. er:: to a chat site(0.2)
  22. // to* a::sk like== people?who would:: (0.2) if anyone had surfed
  23. H: //Hum Hum
  24. B: in //China*?
  (0.1)
  25. H: //Hum
  26. and they said that (.)in China(0.1) it’s just like pretty rare? But in 27.Taiwan:: (.) and Hong Kong(.) there’s good //surfing
  28. H: Em Huh Huh Huh I remember 29. the water being very gro::ss //But
  30. B: Ya ya I heard //that too (.)*I heard the
  31. water’s pretty nasty so
  (0.3)
  32. H: Huh Huh Huh
  34. H: So I don’t know:: HOMEBOY:::
  (0.3)
  35. B: Hm::
  (0.1)
  36. H: Oh (0.2) and there’s SHARKS too
  (0.3)
  37. B: Yeah (0.3) Yeah (0.2) Well (.) I don’t know how much time I have 38. anyways(.) But
  (0.9)
  39. H: Hum
  40. B: Cuz I spend ah:: (.) I’ll probably go:: (0.2) 2 weeks of ( 0.1) in a 41.hospital in Nan Ning?
  (0.1)
  42. H: Hum
  (0.1)
  43. B: study maybe Herbology? (.)
  44. H: Hmm::
  45. B: and ah ::Classics(0.1) you know?
  46. H: Hmm:: (1.0)that’s good stuff(0.3) I’ll tell you WHAT(0.2)when I 47. go back to Canada:: (1.8) summer:: (.) 2006(0.2)you gotta take me 48.man::?
  (0.2)
  49. B: Yeah //yeah
  50. H: We’ll go to that special place you were talkin ab//ou::t   51. B: In Sombrio
  ( 0.3)
  52. H: Yah?
  53. B: Yeah //yeah.
  54. H: I’m down for sure
  (0.1)
  55. B: Very nice(.) li::ke uh(.) pointbreak
  (1.5)
  56. H: Then== we come back to:: (.) we might come like, come back 57.back to He Fei together (stitters…)
  58. B: Maybe? Maybe Hh maybe Hh
  (0.8)
  59. H: Hm//m:::
  60. B: Hefei get’s a little cold //though *( 0.2) I don’t like THAT (0.1)
  61. H: Uhm::
  62. H: Huh Huh::
  (0.2)
  63. H: Hey (0.2) Hefei I lo//ve
  64. B: YOU can pick Beij Beijing too OK? (.) but (0.3)
  65. Beijing’s colder.
  66. H: COLDER::yah(.)I heard(0.5)Super har::d core
  Analyse the transcript (Canadian text)
  Background to the text Face-to-face conversation involving two men recorded as authentic spoken language data for the analysis. The conversation happens over lunch in a small restaurant by two Canadians, Herman and Brett, whose native language is English. They are classmates and roommates studying in An Hui Chinese Traditional Medicine College in He Fei City, An Hui Province, China, and invited by the writer, Bianca, to have lunch together and agree to be recorded simultaneously for the essay. The type of interaction is interpersonal, casual face-to-face conversation.
  General comments In the text, two speakers are talking about the food. Then one speaker talks about his opinions on the traveling places in China. The third person, a Chinese lady and the lunch inviter, no speeches during the recorded part but as a listener. So the Canadians speak a little slowly with less slang to try to be understood by her. As they are eating, there are more and longer pauses in the conversation and the speech speed is slowing down more. Note the formality and careful structure, well-formed sentences and careful grammatical choices at the beginning. As they begin to warm, there is more noticeable overlapping, backchannelling, repetition and hesitation, more natural. Before the passage of conversation, there is in fact another part clipped off, given by Herman and Brett to express the slang of “the ring of fire” to the Chinese lady who can speak and understand quite proper English. To be understood, they in fact spoke less slang, as they told her later. Besides “ the ring of fire”, there are still some other slang in the text, for example, “man”, “like”, “homeboy”, “gotta”, “hard core” and “cuz”, whose appearances or usages usually occur in spoken language instead of in proper written language. For foreigners, many are hard to access to and understand. The lexis is not the point discussed, though, influences the conversation characteristics, so just mentioned a little here.   Introduction of conversation analysis
  Conversation Most everyday speech is conversation. The number of participants is quite small. Most everyday conversation is spontaneous, unplanned and unrehearsed. It takes place in real time so we need to think on our feet. (Cornbleet, 2001, p. 20) Turns are quite short. To give ourselves time to think, we often pause, repetition and hesitation. The nature of everyday conversation is interpersonal with the purpose of communication for maintaining a relationship.
  Types of conversation Conversation has the types of story-telling, opinions, gossip and chat, etc. Some types have a typical structure such as narrative. Talk can be seen as a continuum ranging from formal discourse on the one hand and chat on the other. This would include genres such as narratives, gossip etc. ( Bruns and Joyce, 1997, p.27)
  Conversation analysis Conversation analysis is to analyze natural conversations to discover what the non-linguistic characteristics of conversation are and how conversation is used in daily life. (Richards, Platt, and Platt, 1992) Based on empirical inductive study, it studies the sequential structure and coherence of conversations, examining recordings of real conversations to establish what properties are used in a systematic way when people linguistically interact.(Crystal, 1985) By very complex transcription conversation, a branch of linguistics investigating the structure and social significance of patterns within conversational data, conversation analysis includes the aspects of adjacency pairs, sequences, turn taking, repairs and openings and closings.(Hughes, R, 2002, p.44)
  Adjacency pairs A pair is made up of two turns made by two different speakers. It has been referred to as an adjacency pair. (Tsui, 2000, p. 7) An adjacency pair is a pair of a question and answer. Conversation contains frequent found patterns, such as question – answer. Other examples are as invitation/acceptance, request/compliance, greeting/greeting, violation-rude, etc. In the sample text, we can get the adjacency pairs examples of line 4-5, line 10-11, line 12-13,14, line 15-16, line 19-20,21,22 as the following:
  10. H: Yah? (question for confirmation)
  (0.1)
  11. B: Yah yah:: ( confirmation)
  12. H: HeHh heHh heHh :::→What’s Nan Ning (question)
  (0.2)
  13. B: The:: er. temperature is-s-w- warmer Hh (.)I want some“like”
  14.tropical weather(.) you know (answer and explanation)   In the adjacency pairs there are preferred and dispreferred responses. Preferred responses refer to expected answer, acceptance and agreement. For example, preferred answer examples as:
  29. the water being very gro::ss //But
  30. B: Ya ya I heard //that too (.)*I heard the
  31. water’s pretty nasty so
  35. H: Oh (0.2) and there’s SHARKS too
  (0.3)
  36. B: Yeah (0.3) Yeah (0.2)
  45. H: Hmm:: (1.0)that’s good stuff(0.3) I’ll tell you WHAT(0.2)when I 46. go back to Canada:: (1.8) summer:: (.) 2006(0.2)you gotta take me 47.man::?
  (0.2)
  48. B: Yeah //yeah
  Dispreferred responses refer to disagreements and refusals. For example:
  8. H:I guess you’re right
  (2.5)
  9. B: Can’t wait to get down to Nan Ning(.) man…
  15. H: HeHh heHh heHh heHh(.) Is there surfing there?
  16. B: I don’t think so(.) I(.)I’ll have to go to==er(.) Hong Kong?
  26. and they said that (.)in China(0.1) it’s just like pretty rare? But in 27.Taiwan:: (.) and Hong Kong(.) there’s good //surfing
  28. H: Em Huh Huh Huh I remember
  29. the water being very gro::ss //But
  Sequences “A sequence is made up of more than one turn. For example, a pair embedded inside another pair is lablled an insertion sequence.”(Tsui, 2000, p. 7) For example:
  3. B: It’s good hmm(.)man?
  (0.3)
  4. H: Think?
  5. B: Yah.yah(0.1)It’s not that hot
  (0.5)
  6. H: Hmm
  Here in line 4, Herman does not give his answer directly. Instead, he gives a question to ask the opinion of Brett’s. After get the positive answer from the asker, he then gives his positive answer. So maybe he is not very sure about the answer or maybe he will not give opposite opinion to the asker. So he used insertion sequence in this speaking part.
  Turn taking A turn is seen as everything one speaker says before another begins to speak. Conversation is interactive, so you need more than one person in it, which involves turn-taking, a normal part of human interaction, usually taking as the form of A-B-A-B-A-B. It is cooperate in speaking, and rarely overlaps, also rarely pauses in conversation, which may mean surprising, but it depends on context as well as culture. Turn-taking is a basic, simple principle, an unconscious part of normal conversations. We take turns to say something in a conversation to exchange ideas. A speaks first, then B responds, then A speaks on. The flow of conversation usually turns smoothly. (Cornbleet, Sandra, 2001, p. 20) In the sample, Herman says first then Brett responds, then Herman comes back. Then Brett gets the turn again. The conversation turns move on. Sometimes there are overlaps, a hold on to the turn by lengthening well and hesitates, for example, lo:ve, but B interrupts for example with a increasing volume YOU and stresses very and first vowel in letter. Speakers use overlap when wanting to take the turns with strong will or to hold the floor. We can see overlaps in Line 18,19,22,23,24,25,27,29,30,49,50,53,59,60,63 with the overlap marker //. At the beginning of the conversation, a little formality and uneasiness is in it, almost no overlap. But as the conversation goes on, their attention is paid to the topic of the conversation. Since they are very familiar classmates and roommates, youngsters full of energy, there is no formal politeness between them. They want to take turns to express their opinions first, thus gradually overlapping more, especially in their interesting part. In conversation, the speakers offer contributions at appropriate moments, with no undue gaps or everyone talking over each other. (Cornbleet, Sandra, 2001, p. 20) In the text, there are more frequent and longer gaps and pauses than usual conversation in English, for example, lines between 1 and 2, 6 and 7, 8 and 9. The appropriate time length depends on the context, for they are having lunch. They have to take meals and dishes, which distract their attention from the conversation and even speaking with food in their mouth or chewing and swallowing as they’re speaking. So here longer gaps and pauses are appropriate and understood, not surprising.   End of turn There are several ways to end a turn: completion of syntactic unit followed by pause, falling intonation, mm, anyway, direct question, eye contact, position of body, low pitch, etc.
  Holding the floor As to holding the floor, there are many techniques for doing this and some people are more skillful at it, either naturally or from training. It’s difficult to interrupt someone who’s speaking very fast, or who keeps the intonation raised, signaling they’re continuing, rather than let it fall.( Cornbleet, 2001, p. 21) In the text, turn taking is unequal, with Brett taking most of the turns. From line 4 by Herman “think?”, we see Herman uses insertion sequence trying to get the opinion of Brett, then he gives his own opinion the same as the Brett’s, which based the floor held by Brett in the following conversation, for Herman seems to have no strong will to show his own opinions and he is maybe a good listener than a talker. This can be confirmed in later parts said by him. In all the turns taken by Herman he takes at most 28 turns, of which 7 are direct question with rising tone to end his turn, 10 of which are just backchanelling of “Hum”, “Huh”, “Oh”, etc. He also use completion of syntactic unit followed by pause and falling intonation or low pitch to end his turn. Herman wants to continue his words only in line 28, 56 and 62, but after being overlapped by Breff, he gives up these turns. In contrast, Brett has the strong will to hold the floor and he manages it by means of not pausing long, or pauses in middle of utterance rather than at the end, and also by overlap and increasing volume.
  Repairs Repairs have two kinds as self repair and other repair. The following from the text is other repair:
  1. B: Yah= =erm(.) let gonna try to (0.2)avoid the::(0.4) Ring of red
  (0.8)
  2. H: Avoid the ring of fire:::
  The following is self repair.
  3. B: It’s good hmm(.)man?
  (0.3)
  4. H: Think?
  5. B: Yah.yah(0.1)It’s not that hot
  (0.5)
  6. H: Hmm
  Classroom implications Through analyzing the conversation we can teach students knowing how to signal wanting to keep a turn and recognizing right moments to speak. Teach them how to use turn properly and not to lose it. Through the conversation analysis, students will be aware of the need to be able to recognize other’s intention to speak, to know how to let someone else have a turn, and it’s natural to have hesitation, repetition, explanation, etc. They will have more knowledge, skills and confidence in oral English.
  References:
  [1]Amy B.M.Tsui.(2000).English Conversation.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
  [2]Anne Burns
其他文献
针对初中英语教学特点,本着让生活的源头活水激活传统的初中英语课堂这一教学原则,阐述了如何在初中英语教学中运用生活化内容。主要讨论了创造生活化情境并开展以生活化为中
随着社会的进步与发展,社会对大学毕业生英语水平要求进一步提高,非英语专业学生的英语水平越来越受到重视。大学生为了通过英语四六级考试,通过各种方法来提高英语成绩,但是
【摘要】由于高校毕业生在校期间对社会的竞争激烈程度准备不足,没有在学校时锻炼好自身的综合素质导致其就业时综合竞争力不足,难以适应社会的要求。而学生社团组织可以有效提高高校学生的综合能力,使其逐步适应社会。通过对高校学生参加学生社团的现状进行分析,进而讨论了学生社团组织在高校学生社会化中的作用。  【关键词】学生社团组织 学生社会化  前言  自1999年我国的高等教育扩招以来,高校毕业生人数飞速增
新课标背景下对小学英语教学有了新的要求,教师除了运用大量的语言材料以外,还要加强语言实践,让学生在阅读过程中获取有效信息,激发阅读兴趣,培养阅读能力,提高阅读技巧,为英语的学习及终身学习能力打下坚实的基础。  一、当前小学英语阅读教学存在的问题  当前我国小学英语教学形势不容乐观,尽管在新课标指导下,很多教师对学生的英语阅读教学模式进行了一定的改进,但依旧没有大幅度提高学生的阅读兴趣与阅读能力,很
【摘要】隐喻不仅是一种普遍的语言现象,而且是人类的思维方式和认知工具。它既有助于丰富语言表达,又有利于促进语言习得及创新思维的发展。本文首先对隐喻能力的定义进行回顾,进而探讨隐喻能力在外语教学中的重要性及培养英语学习者隐喻能力的方式。  【关键词】隐喻 隐喻能力 外语教学  一、引言  传统修辞学认为,隐喻是一种语言现象,主要起修辞功能。但随着认知应用语言学的发展,越来越多的国内外学者开始认识到隐
工程硕士培养是我国培养高层次人才的二条重要途径,侧重于工程应用,突出工程特色.现阶段工程硕士培养模式与工学硕士相近,这种培养模式不能满足企事业单位的要求.根据我校土
【摘要】本文以语言迁移理论和英汉对比分析理论为基础,以丹东本地学生为被试,对丹东本地学生英语语音进行采样,重点进行丹东方言语音和英语语音的比较教学,探究丹东方言语音对英语语音习得的影响,并对丹东地区英语语音学习和教学提出可行性建议。  【关键词】丹东方言语音 英语语音 负迁移  一、引言  每一种语言都有其独特的语音系统和发音规律。语音的习得是掌握一门语言的基础。汉语和英语分属于汉藏语系和印欧语系
为探究吕家坨井田地质构造格局,根据钻孔勘探资料,采用分形理论和趋势面分析方法,研究了井田7
期刊
【摘要】“洋泾浜英语”来自Pidgin English的翻译,它是国外语言学界根据清末中国商人发英语business (商务)的蹩脚发音而创造出来的一个新名词,用来通指世界上所有不纯正的混合语。由于历史的因素,从明末开始,洋泾浜英语在中国存在了三个世纪。本文从洋泾浜的产生的历史原因,发音特点谈起,阐述了21世纪以来中国出现的“新洋泾浜英语”的特点,对当代中国英语学习者的部分影响以及它的未来。  【
【摘要】非母语环境下的语言学习是一项系统工程,它无法自然而然的遵循语言学习的规律去进行,在学校的学习以应试为主要目的,在单位的工作以完成任务为主要目的,这就造成了英语学习的一个悖论。众所周知,语言的学习是为了交流,没有起到交流目的的语言学习是一种障碍。因此,本着运用语言进行交流的目的,我们来谈一谈,如何提高口语能力。  【关键词】英语口语 口语能力 交流 提升策略  口语交际是人类每天都在进行的日