“文化工业”自出现以来,就受到各学派的热议。功能主义认为文化工业的产生和发展是为了履行某种重要的社会功能。冲突理论的法兰克福学派将文化工业定性为“欺骗大众”的文化工具。互动理论的学者则认为,文化工业是一种人们日常生活中的互动形式,是有意义且迎合大众内心需求。三种不同的理论观点,在文化工业的发展过程中都以不同的形式呈现出来。 Since the emergence of “Cultural Industry”, it has been hotly debated by various schools. Functionalism holds that the emergence and development of the cultural industry is to fulfill some important social function. The Frankfurt School of Conflict Theory characterizes the cultural industry as a cultural tool for “cheating the masses.” The scholars of interactive theory think that cultural industry is an interactive form in people’s daily life, which is meaningful and caters to the inner needs of the masses. Three different theoretical points of view, in the development of cultural industries are presented in different forms.