论文部分内容阅读
50年代,由于七十回本《水浒》的出版,曾经引起了(盛况远远超过30年代胡适《水浒考证》)一场评论热潮。参加讨论的有茅盾、聂绀弩、王利器、张友鸾等学者(详见《水浒研究论文集》和聂著《水浒五论》)。其中有个争议较大的问题,那就是“《水浒》是不是一部有机的长篇结构”?以茅公、聂绀弩为一方认为,全书不是有机的长篇结构,而是在都市说话人基础上的中短篇的缀合;另一方则认为《水浒》尽管残留着说话时朴素的章回形式,个别章节还有个别英雄的传记特色,但就长篇结构来讲,它仍是一部有机结构的统一体。
In the 1950s, as a result of the publication of Seventy Times’ Water Margin, it had caused a comment craze (the grand occasion far surpassed that of Hu Shi in the 1930s). Participate in the discussion of Mao Dun, Nie Gan crossbow, Wang appliances, Zhang Youlian and other scholars (see << Water Margin Collected Works >> and Nie << Water Margin Fifth Theory >>). One of the more controversial issues is “Is Water Margin an organic, long-term structure?” Taking Mao Gong and Nie Ganbiao as one of the parties, the book is not based on an organic long structure, but on the basis of an urban speaker On the other hand, although Water Margin still possesses the form of simple chapters when speaking, and the individual chapters have the biographies of individual heroes, it is still an organic structure Unity.