一九八一年六月十九日人民日报发表社论,号召“大家都来讲究语言的文明和健康”,要求“正确地使用语言”,做到“既要讲文明,又要讲规范”,指出决不能“听任语言混乱的现象存在而不予纠正”。这是值得高兴的。这篇社论,观点明确,语言健康,但有三处败笔。其一:“毛泽东同志当时写的一篇著名文章《反对党八股》,把‘语言无味,象个瘪三’列为罪状之一,进行了严肃的批评,并且号召全党同志用很大的气力学习语言。”这句话,主谓失调。在语义上,主语应当是“毛泽东同志”,可是在结构上,主语却是“文章《反对党八股》”,即:“文章《反对党八股》把……列为……”;“文章《反对党八股》进行……批评”;“文章《反对党八股》号召……”。用“文章《反对党八股》”作“列为”、“进行”和“号召”等动词谓语的主语,这在语义或逻辑上是说不通的。在结构上之所以出现这种情况,原因就在于“毛泽东同志当时写的一篇著名文章《反对党八股》”这一词组中之“的”字用得不当。用了这个“的”字,“毛泽东同志当时写”这一主谓词组便成了“文章《反对党八股》”的修饰语,修饰语中的“毛泽东同志” On June 19, 1981, the People’s Daily published an editorial calling for “everyone to pay attention to the civilization and health of the language.” They demanded that “the proper use of language” should be implemented so that “both civilization and norms should be called for” Pointed out that it must not “give up the phenomenon of language confusion but not correct it.” This is delightful. This editorial has clear-cut views and good language but has three flaws. First, Comrade Mao Tse-tung wrote a well-known essay entitled “Opposition to the Eighth Party”, made one of the counts of guilt as one of the guiltless claims of language tasteless, and called on all the comrades in the party to exert great force Learn the language. “This sentence, the subject and the imbalance. Semantically speaking, the subject should be ”Comrade Mao Tse-tung,“ but in the structure, the subject is ”the article“ Opposition ”,“ namely: ”article“ Opposition 8-share ” “Carry out ... criticism”; “the article” Opposition 8-share “call ...”. It is semantically or logically impractical to use the “Subject” as the subject of a verb predicate such as “making”, “proceeding” and “calling” the “stereotyped opposition”. The reason why this happens in structure is that “the word” “in the famous article” The Opposition of the Eighth National Party “written by Comrade Mao Tse-tung was not used properly. With this ”word“, ”Comrade Mao Tse-tung wrote this verb and phrase at that time and became the modifier of the article“ Opposition to the Eighth Party ”,“ Comrade Mao Tse-tung ”in the modifier,