论文部分内容阅读
使用“√”或“×”来评判正误,用“优秀”、“良好”、“及格”或“不及格”的来评定作业的完成质量,是目前小学数学作业批改常用的方法。这种做法虽然简单明了、便于操作、易于分辨是非,但是它形式单调,等级用语生硬,缺乏情趣性和激励性,在评价的结果上带有一定的片面性,不能全面评价一个学生的基本素质、学习潜能,也难以寄托和传递老师对学生的关爱和期望,有碍师生之间思想和情感上的交流。针对这些问题,我们借鉴了语文老师批改作文方法,在保留原有数学作业批改方法的基础上,增加了在数学作业上写批语,取得了较好效果。
The quality of the job is assessed by using “√” or “x” to judge whether the job is completed or not, with “good”, “good”, “pass” or “no pass” The current primary school math homework commonly used methods. Although this method is simple, easy to operate and easy to distinguish between right and wrong, its monotonous form, rigid language at the level, lack of interest and motivation have some unilateral features in the evaluation results and can not fully evaluate the basic qualities of a student, Learning potential, it is difficult to pin and pass the teacher’s love and expectation of students, impede the ideological and emotional exchanges between teachers and students. In response to these problems, we learn from the language teacher to modify essay method, while retaining the original math homework modification method, based on the increase in writing assignments in mathematics, and achieved good results.