《文选》卷二张衡《西京赋》“芳草如积”句,李善引《韩诗》及该学派的训诂材料为注。结合李善引《韩诗》注《文选》的体例和东汉薛君《韩诗章句》的著作模式,颇疑李善所引这条注文存在错简的情况。对这条材料进行辨正,不仅可以纠正前人的疏失,还可以恢复《韩诗章句》该条佚文的原貌,并借以彰显“书法”在文献校勘中的重要意义。 “Wen Xuan” volume two Zhang Heng “Xijing fu” “grass as product ” sentence, Li Shan cited “Han poetry” and the school’s exorcise material as a note. In combination with Li Shan cited “Han poetry” Note “anthologies” style and the Eastern Han Xue Jun “Han poetry” mode of writing, suspect Li Shan quoted this note there is a wrong situation. The identification of this material not only can correct the negligence of predecessors, but also restore the original appearance of the lost passage of “Han poem” and demonstrate the importance of “calligraphy” in document collation.