熊牟师弟早年关于格物致知的辩争,代表两种关于中国经典的诠释方向,反映出两人对知识和价值关系的不同思考。这些辩争激发了牟宗三对知识论的关注和研究。本文试图对照熊牟各自晚年的哲学成就,考察这些分歧的意义及其在后来的补充、转折、递进等等关节,这些关节对当代新儒家思想的研究具有重要意义。 Early Kuomintang’s debate on knowledgeable objects represented two directions of interpretations of the Chinese classics, reflecting their different thinking on the relationship between knowledge and value. These debates inspired Mou Zongsan’s attention and research on epistemology. This article attempts to contrast the philosophical achievements of Xiong Mu’s later years and examine the significance of these disagreements and their subsequent supplements, transitions and advancing joints. These joints are of great significance to the study of contemporary Neo-Confucianism.