有一个工厂,车间主任批评某班长“工作一贯不负责任”,结果使这个班长背上了很重的思想包袱。因为这“一贯”二字实际上是对某班长的全盘否定。后来厂党委委书记找这个班长谈心,对他的批评很有分寸,应该肯定的给予肯定,同时又严肃地指出他的毛病,使这个班长心悦诚服,诚恳地作了自我批评。同样是批评,为什么效果如此不同呢?原因就在于批评中对“度”的把握上。 There is a factory, workshop director criticized a squad leader “always irresponsible work,” so that the squad leader back a heavy burden of thought. Because this “consistent” word is actually a total negation of a squad leader. Later, the plant party committee secretary to find the squad leader talked about his criticism very measured, should be affirmed affirmatively, but also seriously pointed out his problems, so that the monitor heartfelt sincere, sincerely made a self-criticism. The same is criticism, why the effect is so different? The reason lies in the criticism of the “degree” on the grasp.