论文部分内容阅读
明代有一则著名的轶闻,常被画坛人士引为谈资,即“真衡山假子朗”的趣事。朱朝字子朗,是文征明(衡山)的得意门人。其画酷似乃师,并常替文征明代笔以了“画债”。当时苏州官宦富贾云集,附庸风雅之习盛行。酒楼茶馆之中,手执一把名家画扇,常常成为主人显赫身份的象征。文征明常常苦于画案上缣素山积,时招朱朗过来代笔。久而久之,有人得悉个中秘密,便索性直接找朱朗画“文画”:一则是文征明的真迹难求,二则也是贪便宜或为转手谋利。某日,有个寓居苏州的金陵人,遣家童
Ming Dynasty there is a famous anecdote, often quoted by the art community talk about funding, that is, “Zhen Hengshan false”. Zi Zhao Zi Chao, Wen Zhengming (Hengshan) proud doorman. The painting resembles the teacher, and often for the Wen Zheng Ming dynasty “painting debt ”. At that time, Suzhou officials rich and wealthy, artwork elegant prevails. Among the restaurant teahouse, holding a famous painting fan, often become a symbol of the masters prominent identity. Wen Zheng-ming often suffer from the plot on the Su-Su-plot plot, when Zhu Long come on behalf of the ghost pen. As time passes, someone learns that there is a secret in it, and then simply looks for Zhu Lang’s painting and painting. The other is that Wen Zhengming’s realism is hard to come by, while the other two are also cheaper or profit-making. One day, there is a Jinling who resides in Suzhou, sending children