论文部分内容阅读
侦查假设指的是刑事侦查人员根据案件的事实情况,运用以往的经验和丰富的知识,对案件需要查明的问题所作出的推测性的解释。侦查假设作为一种特殊的逻辑思维方式,一般说来,是由侦查假设的提出、侦查假设的推演、侦查假设的验证三个阶段形成的。在这一过程中,提出侦查假设是侦查假设建立的起始环节,是侦查活动向揭露和证实犯罪人迈进的必要途径,它对侦查活动起着方向性的作用。 提出侦查假设需要逻辑思维是毋庸置疑的。但由于侦查假设具有推测性、或然性,这就内在决定了侦查假设的提出,实际上存在着许多非逻辑思维的环节,而这些非逻辑思维对于提出侦查假设具有逻辑思维不可替代的作用。从一定意义上说,如果没有非逻辑思维,侦查假设是不可能提出的。 侦查假设提出过程中的非逻辑思想表现为,它是没有按照完整传统思维过程相伴随而发生的对案件事实直接作出的选择、判断。这其中主要包括想象、联想、直觉等因素。
Investigation hypothesis refers to the criminal investigators, based on the facts of the case, the use of past experience and wealth of knowledge, the case needs to be found in the speculative explanations. As a special logical way of thinking, investigation hypothesis is generally formed from three stages: the proposition of investigation hypothesis, the deduction of investigation hypothesis and the verification of investigation hypothesis. In this process, the investigation hypothesis is the initial link in the establishment of investigation hypothesis, which is the necessary way for investigation activities to reveal and confirm the perpetrators. It plays a directive role in investigation activities. There is no doubt about the need for logical thinking in the investigation of hypotheses. However, since the hypothesis of speculation is speculative and contingent, which inherently determines the proposition of investigation, there are actually many non-logical ways of thinking that are irreplaceable for making investigation hypotheses. In a sense, the investigation hypothesis can not be proposed without non-logical thinking. The non-logical thinking in the process of making the investigation hypothesis is that it is a direct choice and judgment made on the facts of the case without accompanying the whole traditional thinking process. This mainly includes imagination, association, intuition and other factors.