论文部分内容阅读
第12届中国新闻奖的评选结果已经见诸报端。作为本届中国新闻奖的评委,我参加了报纸、通讯社类消息、评论作品的评选。中国新闻奖是中国新闻界的年度优秀作品最高奖,各新闻单位无不想金榜题名,无不推荐本单位的最好作品参评。作为评委,可谓“骊龙选珠,颗颗明丽”,而由于获奖数额限制,又不得不“深夜九渊,一取万弃”。虽然难免有遗珠之憾,但研究一下入选者何以入选,落选者何以落选不仅对改进参评作品的选送,而且对改进新闻写作,都不无益处。下面我就消息的评选和写作讲3点看法:
The 12th China News Awards results have been seen in the newspapers. As the jury of this year’s China News Awards, I participated in the newspaper, news agency class news, comments on the selection of works. China News Awards is the highest award in the annual press work of the Chinese press. All news organizations want the title of the golden list, and all the best works of the organization are recommended for evaluation. As a judge, can be described as “Li Long election beads, bright and beautiful”, and due to the amount of award-winning, they had to “late at night, take a million.” Although it is inevitable that there will be no regrettable questions, it is of no use to study why the winners are selected and why the loser will lose the election not only to improve the selection of participating works, but also to improve the writing of the news. Here’s my comment on the news and writing about 3 comments: