“历史教学”1956年九月号发表了林平野、陈扬灵二位同志的“第一次国内革命战争时期帝国主义对中国革命的干涉”一文。对于这篇文章,我提出如下一些意见.首先,作者利用了很大的篇幅想说明英国在北伐战争中主要“采取外交谈判的形式,进行分裂阴谋,用一些让步来引诱民族资产阶级使之退出统一战线”。当然,这是帝国主义一贯的伎俩,但就当时的具体情况看来,英国主要是在搞武装干涉;日本则主要进行“南北妥协”的工作;美国则乘英日的矛盾,积极从革命内部来寻找它的代理人,因此,作者所得出的结论是不全面的。下面是我的一点看法和补充意见提供参考: In his September 1956 issue of History Teaching, Comrade Lin Pingye and Chen Yangling published a speech entitled “Interference by the Imperialists with the Chinese Revolution during the First Civil War.” For this article, I put forward the following opinions: First, the author took a great deal of space to illustrate that Britain had mainly “taken the form of diplomatic negotiations during the Northern Expedition, engaged in a separatist conspiracy and used some concessions to lure the national bourgeoisie out United front ”. Of course, this is a common trick of imperialism. However, judging from the specific circumstances at that time, Britain mainly engaged in armed intervention. Japan mainly conducted “North-South compromise” work. The United States took the contradiction between Britain and Japan and aggressively moved from the interior of the revolution To find its agent, therefore, the author’s conclusion is not comprehensive. Here is my point of view and supplementary comments provide a reference: