论文部分内容阅读
当代书法评判,我以为可从学术层面评判作品优劣,这样就抛开了其他非学术标准。具体说来,可从四点人手。内容的原创性一件书法作品,如果在书写中自觉或不自觉地呈现了情感、思想、意趣、学养以及书法技巧的综合之境,这种呈现就达到了一种艺术的、哲学的、人文的高度。观书史上,王羲之的《兰亭序》,颜真卿的《祭侄稿》,苏东坡的《黄州寒食诗》等经典名帖,书写内容首先都是不可复制与原创,都自抒胸臆,切合自身境遇,有感而发,无意于书法而书法自佳的手稿。
In contemporary calligraphy judgments, I think I can judge the pros and cons of works from an academic level, thus leaving aside other non-academic standards. Specifically, from four people. The originality of a piece of calligraphic works, if presented consciously or unconsciously in the writing of a combination of emotion, thought, interest, education and calligraphy skills, this presentation has reached an artistic, philosophical, humanistic the height of. In the history of book-reading, Wang Xizhi’s “Lanting Preface”, Yan Zhenqing’s “offering of his late husband and wife”, Su Dongpo’s “Huangzhou Cold Food Poems” and other classic posts, writing content are not copied and original, are self-expression, meet their own situation , Feel and send, not intended for calligraphy and calligraphy manuscripts.