论文部分内容阅读
莱辛在《拉奥孔》这部美学著作中划清了诗与画的界限,且提出了诗和画的优劣问题。本文将对莱辛提出的画宜于描绘物体和诗宜于表现运动做自己的几点阐释:动和静是同时可以存在于时间和空间之中,而其结果下“画”和“诗”的张力效果远远超于一般画对静止的表现和诗对运动的描绘。此外,针对莱辛隐射出的诗优于画笔者也做了相反的阐释。
Lessing made a clear distinction between poetry and painting in his aesthetic work “Laocoon”, and put forward the pros and cons of poetry and painting. In this paper, we will make some explanations for Lessing’s painting, which is suitable for depicting objects and poems in the performance of movement: the dynamic and the static can exist in both time and space at the same time, and the results under the “painting” and “ The tension of ”poem" far surpasses that of ordinary painting on static performance and poetic movement. In addition, poems drawn from Lessing’s discourse are superior to those of the brush.