《汉书·艺文志》“慎子”条下班固自注云 :“名到 ,先申、韩 ,申、韩称之。”申 ,即申不害 ;韩 ,即韩非。钱穆《先秦诸子系年》早已辨明申不害早于慎到。那么 ,班固为什么说慎到“先申、韩 ,申、韩称之”呢 ?纵观《汉书·艺文志》 ,类似的体例还有如下几条 :(一 )《列子》八篇 “Han Yi Wen Zhi” “Prodigal” Article solid since the note cloud: “Name to, first Shen, Han, Shen, Han called.” Shen, that Shen never hurt; Han, that is, Han Fei. Qian Mu “Pre-Qin Zhu Yi Year” has long been identified as Shen not earlier than cautious. So, Bancun why cautious to “Shen Shen, Han, Shen, Han called it” Throughout the “Han Yi Wen Zhi”, there are a few similar ways: (a) “Liezi” eight