在一次高三复习公开课上,笔者讲评一份高考模拟试卷,其中的文言阅读题材料出自《史记·刺客列传》,传主是用匕首劫齐桓公求返鲁地的曹沫。我即兴联系初中课文《曹刿论战》,告诉学生曹沫就是曹刿。在评课活动中,听课的老师们对我的“曹沫即是曹刿”一说颇为怀疑。他们说,“曹刿”和“曹沫”写法不同,两人的表现也不一样,一个足智 In a Senior 3 review class, the writer commented on a college entrance examination simulation test paper, in which the materials of classical Chinese reading questions were from “Historical Records of the Assassin”, and the passer-by was guilty of robbing Qi Gonggong and returning to Lu. I improvised to contact junior high school text “Cao Yu Controversy,” telling students Cao Mo is Cao Yu. In the assessment activities, the teachers who listened to the lecture were quite suspicious of my “Cao Mo is Cao Yu.” They said that “Cao Yu” and “Cao Mo” are different ways of writing. The performance of the two people is not the same.