论文部分内容阅读
流行性出血热的临床表现具有多型、多变之特点,且早期缺乏特异性较强的诊断方法,颇易误诊。本文就505例出血热中误诊的64例,分析其误诊原因,并扼要阐述鉴别诊断,以冀提高对该病1的诊断水平。一、一般资料:504例中误诊的63例病历资料源于武汉医师学院教学基地医院,1例为和平医院,诊断均按照1975年全国制定的流行性出血热标准确诊。本组病例误诊率为12.67%,病类达19种。性别::男50例,女14例。年龄:最大67岁,最小6岁。成人56例,小儿8例(均死亡)。误诊病例死
The clinical manifestations of epidemic hemorrhagic fever with multi-type, changing characteristics, and early lack of specific strong diagnostic methods, quite easy to misdiagnosis. In this paper, 505 cases of hemorrhagic fever misdiagnosed 64 cases, analysis of the causes of misdiagnosis, and outlines the differential diagnosis, in order to improve the diagnosis of the disease 1 level. First, the general information: 504 cases of misdiagnosed 63 cases of medical records from the Wuhan Medical College Teaching Base Hospital, a case of Peace Hospital, diagnosed in accordance with the 1975 national epidemic of hemorrhagic fever diagnosis. Misdiagnosis rate of this group of patients was 12.67%, 19 kinds of diseases. Gender: male 50 cases, female 14 cases. Age: up to 67 years old, minimum 6 years old. 56 cases of adult, 8 cases of children (all died). Misdiagnosed cases died