在风险社会视野下,抽象危险犯的设立迎合了法益保护的发展潮流,加强了对于危害公害的行为预防,是刑法为了面向社会而做出的一种有效的规范应对。但是,对于是否允许抽象危险犯以“具体的案件中未发生相应的危险”为理由而出罪,学术界仍不乏争辩。鉴于抽象危险犯的刑法设置中规定的是事先推定的危险,并非拟制的危险,因此应当在程序上做应然性限缩,允许反证危险并不存在从而出罪。 From the perspective of risk society, the establishment of abstract dangerous criminals meets the trend of development of legal protection, and strengthens the prevention of harmful behaviors. It is an effective normative response to the criminal law in order to face the society. However, there is still no shortage of arguments in academic circles whether to allow abstract dangerous criminals to commit crimes on the ground that “the corresponding dangerousness does not occur in specific cases”. In view of the fact that the provision of criminal law of abstract dangerous criminals presupposes the presumption of danger and is not a proposed danger, it should be limited in procedure so as to allow the risk of counter-evidence not to exist and thus to be guilty of an offense.