论文部分内容阅读
作文批改是一项令教师头疼的事,因为对作文的批改,我们习惯于用“优”“良”来评判,或采用打分制量分。随之教师加上一些套话“此文语言通顺,中心明确,首尾呼应”等评语,此法枯燥乏味、缺乏激励性,评价结果带有一定的片面性,不能全面评价一个学生的作文水平、学习潜力。当同行们在为学生的习作头疼时,苦恼时,有没有想到是我们墨守成规的作文评语对学生的作文造成了负面影响呢?换一种角度,改变一下风格,这样会起到意想不到的效果。
The correction of composition is a headache for teachers. Because of the correction of composition, we are accustomed to using “excellent” and “good” to judge, or to use scoring points. Then the teacher added some clichés, such as the language fluent, the center clear, echoing from the beginning to the end, etc. This method was boring and lacking motivation, and the evaluation result had a certain one-sidedness and could not fully evaluate the composition level of a student. Learning potential. When colleagues were troubled by the student’s work, when they were distressed, did they think that our essay-writing comments had a negative impact on the students’ composition? From another perspective, changing the style would have unexpected effects. .