论文部分内容阅读
作者应用锝~(99m)溶液滴入中鼻道,以闪烁扫描仪测定纤毛机能。选择92名鼻正常学生为受试者。第一组23名46侧使用~(99mTc·HSA10μl(人血清白蛋白),16名31侧使用~(99m)Tc·HSA5μl,12名24侧使用~(99m)Tc·生理盐水(制成锝~(99m)生理盐水),第二组8名16侧使用~(99m)Tc·HSA5μl,每人连续鼻腔闪烁扫描两次,每次间隔1分钟。第三组23名实验同第二组,只其中10名做第二次扫描时,堵塞前鼻孔,改用口呼吸,另13名堵塞一例鼻孔,另孔用于呼吸。第四组步骤同二和三组,只是第二次测试时为运动负荷之后。并选择31人不吸烟、20人吸烟者做对照研究。(吸烟史4.5年,每日量19.2支)。结果发现:①非吸烟者的排除率在盐水10μl、HSA10μl及HSA5μl实验组差异较大,半量排除时间三者间差异较小。②非吸烟与吸烟者比较,吸烟者的粘液纤毛排除率在SHA10μl和盐水10μl组与非吸烟者比较差异不大,但作者认为HSA10μl容易反映出鼻腔病损。③非吸烟者
The authors applied technetium ~ (99m) solution into the middle of the nasal passages to determine the ciliary function with a scintillation scanner. 92 normal students were selected as subjects. The first group of 23 patients on the 46 side used ~ (99mTc HSA 10μl human serum albumin), 16 patients 31 side used 99m Tc HSA 5μl, 12 patients on the 24 side used 99m Tc physiological saline made of technetium ~ (99m) saline), the second group of 8 16 ~ side using ~ (99m) Tc · HSA 5μl, continuous nasal scintigraphy twice per patient, each interval of 1 minute.The third group of 23 experiments with the second group, Only 10 of them did the second scan, blocking the front nostrils, switch to mouth breathing, the other 13 blocked a nostril, another hole for breathing.The fourth group of steps with two and three groups, but the second test is After exercise stress, 31 non-smokers and 20 smokers were selected as controls (smoking history was 4.5 years and 19.2 cigarettes per day) .Results: ① The rate of non-smokers was significantly higher in 10μl saline, 10μl HSA and 5μl HSA The difference between the two groups was small and the difference between the two groups was small.②The mucus cilia elimination rate of smokers was not different from that of non-smokers in SHA 10μl and saline 10μl group, but the authors thought HSA10μl was easy Reflect the nasal lesions. ③ non-smoker