论文部分内容阅读
目的探究比较不同吻合器在治疗贲门癌、食管癌手术中的应用效果。方法 100例贲门癌食管癌患者,随机分成对照组和实验组,各50例。对照组选用金属钉吻合器,实验组选用镍钛记忆合金加压吻合环,观察两组的治疗效果。结果对照组并发症发生率为10%,实验组并发症发生率为2%,实验组并发症发生率低于对照组(P<0.05);实验组患者手术时间、手术中出血量、愈合时间和住院时间均优于对照组,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对于贲门癌食管癌患者采用镍钛记忆合金加压吻合环进行手术的效果更佳,并发症发生较少,可以在临床上广泛推广。
Objective To investigate and compare the effect of different staplers in the treatment of cardiac cancer and esophageal cancer. Methods 100 cases of cardiac cancer patients with esophageal cancer were randomly divided into control group and experimental group, 50 cases each. The control group used metal stapler, the experimental group used nickel-titanium memory alloy compression anastomosis ring to observe the treatment effect of the two groups. Results The incidence of complications in the control group was 10%, the incidence of complications in the experimental group was 2%, the incidence of complications in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05); the operation time, blood loss, and healing time in the experimental group The hospital stay was better than the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusions For patients with cardiac cancer and esophageal cancer, the use of a nickel-titanium shape memory alloy compression anastomosis ring is more effective and fewer complications can occur. It can be widely used in clinical practice.