《安徽教育》(1993,1——2期)刊登了许青山的《“长烟一空,皓月千里”是对偶吗?》一文。认为“长烟一空,皓月千里”不是对偶句,其理由是“词性不相对”。许同志还认为构成对偶句的条件是两个(“词性相同”、“字数相等”)。我们觉得值得商榷。 “Anhui Education” (1993, 1 - 2 issues) published Xu Qingshan’s article “Is Long-smoked, Long-winded, Long-winded? Is It Even?”. It is not a dual sentence that “long smoke is empty, long-term, long-lasting”. The reason is that “part of speech is not relative.” Comrade Xu also believes that the conditions for constructing a pair of sentences are two (“speech-like” and “equal words”). We think it is worth discussing.