论文部分内容阅读
今天看到的中国古代早期经典文献,多数产生在唐代以前。这些文献,从口传到写本,从钞本到定本,再从定本到经典,经历了一个相当漫长的历史时期,中间不可避免地会发生很多变异,以至于今天所看到的中国早期经典文献,资料来源非常复杂,作者问题言人人殊。如何理解这些繁杂的问题,中外学者曾有过深入的探讨,也有过激烈的争论,迄今未曾消歇。当前,中国早期钞本文献问题,又成为热点话题,其中蕴含着许多深层次的理论思考,值得关注。站在历史的高度,研究梳理了中国早期文献传播的历史进程,又通过对中西历史观念的比较,探讨了从事钞本时代文献研究的基本途径,即文本细读、文献考订、理论思索,三者并重,并愿以此为契机,努力寻求学界同仁就此一问题展开讨论,形成基本共识。
The ancient Chinese early classic documents seen today mostly came before the Tang Dynasty. These documents, from word of mouth to script, from notes to texts, and then from script to scriptures, have undergone a rather long historical period with many variations inevitably occurring in the middle, so that the early Chinese classic documents seen today, The sources of information are very complicated, and the author’s questions make a remarkable difference. How to understand these complicated issues has been explored by both Chinese and foreign scholars in depth. There have also been fierce arguments and so far they have not been eliminated. At present, the issue of Chinese early banknote literature has become a hot topic again, which contains many deep-seated theoretical considerations that deserve our attention. Standing at the historical height, the study combed the historical process of Chinese early literature dissemination, and through the comparison of Chinese and Western historical ideas, explored the basic ways of engaging in the research of the literature in the era of banknote, that is, reading through text, textual reviewing, theoretical thinking, We should also take this as an opportunity to seek academic collegiality to discuss this issue and form a basic consensus.