论文部分内容阅读
国际投资条约仲裁在国际投资交往中越来越常见,一般对于国际投资条约仲裁的论述都将其归于国际商事仲裁之中,在国际投资条约仲裁实践中,往往是运用或者是基本沿用国际商事仲裁的机制。但是国际投资条约仲裁在当事人双方的地位、仲裁请求权的性质以及仲裁事项等方面明显不同于国际商事仲裁。本文通过对比分析国际投资仲裁与国际商事仲裁本质的不同,提出对国际投资条约仲裁机制重构的宏观方向,以平衡投资者私人利益和东道国的国家利益与社会公共利益。
The arbitration of international investment treaties is more and more common in international investment exchanges. Generally speaking, all the treaties on arbitration of international investment treaties are attributed to international commercial arbitration. In the practice of arbitration of international investment treaties, they often use or basically follow the international commercial arbitration mechanism. However, the arbitration of IIAs is obviously different from that of international commercial arbitration in the status of both parties, the nature of the arbitration claim and the matters of arbitration. By contrasting the differences between the international investment arbitration and the international commercial arbitration, this paper proposes a macro-direction for reconstructing the arbitration mechanism of international investment treaties so as to balance the private interests of investors and the national interests of the host country with the public interests.