论文部分内容阅读
本文聚焦于从《朱子语类》文本演变的过程分析“朱子诋吕”这一南宋理学公案如何为朱子后学所塑造和强化。朱熹(1130-1200)和吕祖谦(1137-1181)皆为南宋理学大家,二人交游、论辩甚多,亦多被视为淳熙年间理学家共同体之代表人物。但自吕祖谦过世之后,朱熹对吕氏学问进行了深入批评,并最终造成了吕祖谦未能进入《宋史·道学门》。本文通过对这一公案最重要的文献,即朱熹过世后六十年由黎靖德编纂而成的《朱子语类》一书的结构性分析,并将之与朝鲜古写徽州本《朱子语类》对比,描绘出黎靖德在此书尤其是第122卷《吕伯恭》中有意为之的增删取舍之处,从而呈现出黎靖德是如何将多元的淳熙年间理学群体纳入到朱子学道统谱系的视域之中。由此揭示出宋代理学中一以贯之的道统意识是如何经由朱子后学之手,更深入地渗透于朱熹过世后的南宋思想史之中。
This article focuses on the analysis of the process of the evolution of the texts of Zhuzi language categories. Zhu Xi (1130-1200) and Lu Zuqian (1137-1181) are all Southern Song neo-Confucianism, two people make friends, many arguments, but also be regarded as the representative of the community of physicists Chunxi years. However, since Lu Zuqian’s death, Zhu Xi conducted an in-depth criticism of Lu’s scholarship and finally caused Lu Zuqian’s failure to enter the “Song Dynasty and Taoism.” This article analyzes the structural analysis of the most important literary text of this case, that is, Zhu Xi’s genre, which was compiled by Li Jingdeng six decades after Zhu Xi’s death, and compares it with the ancient Zhuzhou dialect, In contrast, Li Jingde depicts the intentional additions and deletions of Li Jingde in this book, especially Volume 122, which shows how Li Jingde incorporated the diverse Chunxi Neo-Confucianism into the sight of Zhu Xi’s scholarly lineage system . It reveals how a consistent sense of Taoism in Song Dynasty’s Neo-Confucianism permeated thoroughly the thought history of Southern Song Dynasty after Zhu Xi’s death.