论文部分内容阅读
反对未经思考的张嘴就来,反对倚老卖老的陈词滥调。如果没有更多的汽车业有识之士,那就没有更好的中国汽车未来。今年国庆以后,我们新能源汽车学术沙龙在对秦这样的插电式混合动力车补贴提出质疑后,紧接着《汽车商业评论》又做了一期封面文章《秦的是非》对这个问题进行了更为深入的探讨。在自以为说清楚问题实质之后,没有想到还有那么多人是非不分。先是比亚迪有话说,出于防卫的本能,这么做也情有可原。但是一些搞过汽车的专家和一些在做媒体的人却不知道出于什么样的原因,以混淆争论焦点的方式来非理性地袒护自己的观点。“文革”已经过去很久,但那种强大的中国式逻辑还在。
Opponents of unanswered remarks oppose clichés that rely on old-timer sales. Without more knowledgeable people in the automotive industry, there is no better future for the Chinese car. After the National Day of this year, our New Energy Vehicle Academic Salon queried the subsidy for plug-in hybrid vehicles such as Qin, followed by the Automotive Business Review with a cover story entitled “Qin’s Right and Non-Necessity” More in-depth discussion. After thinking that the essence of the problem is clear, there are still so many people in the world thinking about it. First BYD has something to say, out of defensive instincts, so inexcusable. However, some car experts and some people in the media do not know for whatever reason that they can irrationally defend their views by confusing their arguments. “Cultural Revolution” has been going on for a long time, but the kind of powerful Chinese logic remains.