论文部分内容阅读
回顾国内外学术界围绕皮凯蒂《21世纪资本论》的有关争论,并对之进行反思,不仅有助于我们选择合适的反思路径去对待任何一种有争议的理论或学派,也有助于确立理论创新的路向。正如当初针对《21世纪资本论》所展开的激烈争论那样,人们把反思的矛头指向它是否对马克思的《资本论》构成真正的理论挑战,这样的理论反应既具有我们习以为常的立场性的本能式反应特点,也有其基本性的合理性特点。换言之,如果皮凯蒂的理论对《资本论》的理论内核构成本质性的挑战,那么对其展开立场性的批判当然是必要的,在这里出现的是以理论问题为导向的批判。但是,如果一种外来的思潮或学派聚焦于人类共同面对的现实问题,不论它用于讨论和解决这一问题的理论工具是不是我们所认同的,在对其理论工具做出适度反应的同时,我们对这一思潮或学派的更重要的关注点,应当是它所指向的现实问题和解决方案,以及这一方案的可借鉴性价值。
Recalling the domestic and foreign academic circles around Picatty “21st Century Capital Theory” controversy, and reflect on it, not only help us to choose the appropriate path of reflection to treat any controversial theory or school, but also help Establish the direction of theoretical innovation. Just as the fierce debate on “Capitalism in the 21st Century” began, people pointed the spearhead of reflection to whether or not it posed a real theoretical challenge to Marx’s “capitalism.” Such a theoretical response not only had our usual instinctive instincts Type reaction characteristics, but also has its basic characteristics of the rationality. In other words, if Picatti’s theory constitutes an essential challenge to the theoretical kernel of Capital, it is of course necessary to criticize it in a constructive manner. Here, there emerges the critique of theoretical issues. However, if an alien thought or school of thought focuses on the real problems common to mankind, regardless of the theoretical tools it uses to discuss and solve the problem, we do not agree with it. Instead, we respond modestly to its theoretical tools At the same time, our more important focus on this trend of thought or school should be its realistic problems and solutions as well as the referential value of this program.