论文部分内容阅读
1984年后,有些企业主管部门的经费由财政拨款改为向所属企业提取管理费,由于对管理费的提取、使用缺乏必要的监督,使这项管理费的收支基本上处于失控状态。按现行办法,管理费按企业销售收入1%提取,一是提取依据不合理,二是标准偏高。我市煤炭化学工业局、工业局、一轻工业局、二轻工业局、建材工业公司、纺织工业公司等6单位,1987年干部职工184人,全年收取管理费142,085元,人平达7,722元,是我市行政、事业单位人平人头经费的3.5倍。1987年这6个主管部门共支出管理费81.36万元,人平达4,422元,是我市行政、事业单位人平人头经费的2倍。由于管理费提取标准过高,减少了企业利润,
After 1984, some enterprises’ administrative departments changed their funding from fiscal appropriation to appropriation of management fees to their affiliated companies. Due to the lack of necessary supervision on the extraction and use of administrative expenses, the revenues and expenditures of this administrative expense were basically out of control. According to the current approach, management fees extracted by 1% of sales revenue, first, unreasonable extraction basis, and second, the standard is high. 6 units of coal chemical industry bureau, industrial bureau, a light industrial bureau, two light industrial bureaus, building materials industrial companies, textile industrial companies, etc. In 1987, 184 cadres and workers, the annual management fee 142,085 yuan, people flat up to 7,722 yuan, Is the city administrative, public institutions people head of funding 3.5 times. In 1987, the six administrations spent a total of 813,600 yuan on management fees and 4,422 yuan on average, which was twice as much as the administrative and institutional units in the city. As the management fee extraction standards are too high, reducing corporate profits,