论文部分内容阅读
研究者对张载“太虚”的理解不尽相同,“气本论”和“太虚本体论”的争论之处不在于“太虚”是否存在,而在于“太虚”是否等同于“气”。然而,从张载的原著中不难看出,“太虚”与“气”是完全不同的两个概念,不可混同。在张载那里,“太虚”是宇宙万物的本原和存在场所,是至静无感、无形实有的永恒存在,是人类认知和道德实践的终极指向。
Researchers’ different understandings of Zhang Zai and “Taixu” are that the controversy between “Qi Ben” and “Taixuan Ontology” lies not in the existence of “Taixu” but in “Too virtual ” is equivalent to “gas ”. However, it is not difficult to see from Zhang Zai’s original works that “too virtual” and “qi” are two completely different concepts and should not be mixed with each other. In Zhang Zaili’s account, “Too ” is the original place of existence of all things in the universe. It is an eternity that has no sense or impression of reality. It is the ultimate point of human cognition and moral practice.