论文部分内容阅读
国家自然科学基金自设立之初起,一直采用“同行评议”做为遴选资助项目的方法。事实证明,这种方法是较为有效和科学的,当然也不可避免地存在着一些弊病。为此国家自然科学基金委员会专门设立了软课题,对比国外科学基金组织的工作情况,对这一问题进行深入研究。另外,各学科、学部在多年的实践中也不断地探索、改进其操作方法。我们希望更多的热心科学基金事业的专家、学者积极参与这一问题的讨论,以便能够扬长避短,促进科学基金制的不断完善。
Since its founding, NSFC has been using “peer review” as a method of selecting funded projects. Facts have proved that this method is more effective and scientific, of course, there are inevitably some shortcomings. To this end, the National Natural Science Foundation of China has set up a special soft subject to compare the work of the Foreign Scientific Fund and conduct an in-depth study on this issue. In addition, various disciplines, the Department in many years of practice also continue to explore and improve its methods of operation. We hope that more experts and scholars enthusiastic about the cause of the science fund will actively participate in discussions on this issue in order to be able to avoid weaknesses and promote the continuous improvement of the science fund system.