一般来说,关于“道”的评述和解读大都是侧重于其哲学层面的,似乎“道”与“美学范畴”离得还很遥远,实际上,把“道”划归到美学范畴内是有道理的,也是成立的。当然,关于“道”在美学层面上的解读远不如关于西方美学史上的经典范畴诸如“崇高”“优美”甚至“丑”和“荒诞”等等。关于它们西方不同时代的大哲学家和美学家都进行了深刻而详尽的论述,所以它们的成立及其意义和影响是不用 Generally speaking, the comments and interpretations on the Tao mainly focus on their philosophical aspects. It seems that the Tao is still far away from the aesthetic category. In fact, “It is reasonable to set it within the category of aesthetics and it is also true. Of course, the interpretation of ”Tao “ at the aesthetic level is far less than the classic categories in the history of western aesthetics such as ”sublime “ ”grace “ and even ”ugly “ and ”absurd " and so on. The great philosophers and estheticians who have dealt with them in different periods of the West have conducted profound and exhaustive expositions, so their establishment and their significance and influence do not