论文部分内容阅读
2.5,柯尔孔“框架到体制”,关于记忆和折衷主义(对佩夫斯纳的历史主义的解说的异议) 关于记忆与折衷主义(前书P.125-) 记忆的功能可以从两方面来理解。个人的心理学和社会传播,二者都和建筑与城镇的讨论有关。现存城市的基本事实,其中一个事实依旧在说明它们的“可读性”就是折衷主义:不同的过去风格的同时存在和表演。从十八世纪末叶直至现代运动的开始,折衷主义是公认的方式,在这里记忆在城市中起了它的作用。十九世纪新的、迅速繁殖的建筑类型能够作为一种表达的系统吸收进城市只是因为它附着于任何一种“风格”。因此“风格”的概念和“类型”的概念是折衷主义建筑的自然结果。记忆的现实化在建筑意义的确定中起了重要的作
2.5, Cole-Koon’s “Framework to the System”, on Memory and Eclecticism (Dissenting Objections to Pavsner’s Historicism) Memory and Eclecticism (previously P.125-) Memory function can be from two aspects To understand. Personal psychology and social communication are both related to the discussion of architecture and towns. The basic facts of the existing cities, one of which is still illustrating their “readability” is eclecticism: the simultaneous existence and performance of different past styles. From the end of the eighteenth century to the beginning of the modern movement, eclecticism was the accepted method, where memory played its role in the city. The new, rapidly multiplying building types of the nineteenth century could be absorbed into the city as a system of expression simply because it was attached to any “style.” So the concept of “style” and the concept of “type” are the natural result of eclectic architecture. The actualization of memory plays an important role in the determination of architectural significance