后世对于《长门赋》想当然地认为是司马相如为陈皇后求宠而作,因此解读的视角与范围总是离不开陈皇后。但其序文前后龃龉与史实不符,并不足为信。因此,撰文求宠的源头已断,序已错误,其主旨何以延续旧说?经过考察相关文献,认为《长门赋》非为陈皇后所作。而是,司马相如在元光六年末至元朔元年,被人揭发受贿而失官后,心情抑郁,作此赋抒发自己被贬思君的情怀。 Later generations for the “long door Fu” take it for granted that Sima Xiangru pet for the queen and made, so the interpretation of the perspective and scope are always inseparable from the queen of Chen. However, its preface and postmortem inconsistent with the historical facts, and not enough for the letter. Therefore, the source for the pet petition has been broken, the order has been wrong, the main reason why the continuation of the old? After investigating the relevant literature, that the “Longmen Fu” for Chen made. Instead, Sima Xiangru, who was exposed in the late Yuan Dynasty to the first year of the Yuan Shuo six years ago, was found guilty of depriving him of his sovereignty after being exposed to bribes and feeling depressed.