论文部分内容阅读
成文法的缺陷使法律解释成为必要。而目前最高人民法院的司法解释并非法官在审理案件过程中将立法的结果进行个案化还原,本质上讲仍属立法的模式,因此不足以弥补成文法的缺陷。本文结合浙江(2005)余民二初字第541号加工承揽合同案件判决对《中华人民共和国合同法》第265条的解释,来说明法官个案解释的必要性并探讨法官应如何遵循学理解释规则。
The defects of statutory law make legal interpretation necessary. At present, the judicial interpretation of the Supreme People's Court is not a case in which the judge reinstates the result of the legislation during the trial of a case, which is still essentially a legislative model and thus is not sufficient to make up for the shortcomings of the written law. This article combined the Zhejiang (2005) Yu Min Er Chu Zi No. 541 processing contract contract case judgment on the “Contract Law of the People's Republic of China” to explain the necessity of article 265 to explain how judges should follow the rules of interpretation .