论文部分内容阅读
屈原卒年研究是楚辞学中的重大课题。由于史料缺乏,屈原自沉的具体年代迄今尚无定论,可成一家之说的计有十余家,其中影响最大、而问题也最多的是郭沫若先生的“郢破说”。两千多年来,大多数学人囿于《屈原列传》及刘向《新序·节士》的屈原传说,将屈原的生活时代锁定在怀襄两世,因而先验地把屈原的卒年定在顷襄王朝的某一年,这不合《楚世家》之正史记载,亦不能在屈原作品中找到内证。本文支持清人王懋竑“屈原卒于怀王入秦以前”的观点,并为其中论。
Qu Yuan years study is a major issue in the study of Chu. Due to the lack of historical data, the specific era of Qu Yuan’s self-indulgence has not yet been decided. Up to now, there have been more than a dozen, of which the influence is the most influential. The most problematic are the statements by Mr. Guo Moruo. For more than two thousand years, most scholars, based on the Quyuan legends about Qu Yuan’s Biography and Liu Xiang’s “New Orleans”, locked Qu Yuan’s life into Huai-hsiang-shih so as to transcentify Qu Yuan’s death year Set in the year of the Empire, this does not correspond to the official records of “Chu family” and can not find internal evidence in Qu Yuan’s works. This article supports Qing Ren Wang Mao-tao “Qu Yuan died in Huai Qin into the Qin before ” point of view, and for which theory.