论文部分内容阅读
在“機動車托架”發明專利無效案中,最高人民法院認為,獨立權利要求中記載的必要技術特徵應當與專利說明書中記載的專利所要解决的技術問題相對應,在說明書中明確記載專利技術方案能够同時解决多個技術問題的,獨立權利要求中應當記載能够同時解决各個技術問題的必要技術特徵。~1無獨有偶,歐洲專利局上訴委員會在2015年初作出判决的T2001/12案中也認定獨立權利要求限定的必要技術特徵應當與說明書中指出的要解决的技術問題相對應。
In the case of invalidation of invention patent of motor vehicle bracket, the Supreme People’s Court held that the necessary technical features recorded in the independent claim should correspond to the technical problem to be solved by the patent described in the patent specification, and clearly state in the specification The patented solution can solve a plurality of technical problems at the same time, and the independent claims should contain the necessary technical features that can solve all the technical problems at the same time. ~ 1 In the case of T2001 / 12, which the EPB Board of Appeal ruled in early 2015, it was also found that the necessary technical features defined in the independent claim should correspond to the technical problems to be solved as indicated in the specification.