论文部分内容阅读
读1979年《财务与会计》第五期《防错和找错》一文后,感到这篇文章既简明地论述了“错”与“对”的辩证关系,又详尽地叙述了“防错和找错”的各个方面,写得比较全面。其美中不足之处,是在“找错”这个问题上某些提法欠妥。现就“1”、“2”、“3”种找错方法中的几个问题,提出来和绿叶同志商榷: 第一,在第“1”种“找错”方法中提到:“当错数是9的倍数且在100以内时,有可能是两个数字位置颠倒,如:12记成21时多9,52记成25时少27。” 这里,作者给产生这类“差数”提出了两个前提条件
After reading the fifth issue of “Finance and Accounting” in 1979, entitled “Making a mistake and finding a mistake,” I feel that this article has both succinctly discussed the dialectical relationship between “wrong ” and “right ” and described in detail “Error-proof and find fault ” in all aspects, write more comprehensive. The beauty of the problem is that some of the “wrong” on the issue of some defects. Now on the “1 ”, “2 ”, “3 ” kind of mistakes in several ways, put forward to discuss with the green leaves comrades: First, in the Wrong “method mentioned: ” When the number of errors is a multiple of nine and less than 100, it is possible that the two numbers reversed position, such as: 12 when recorded as 21 more than 9,52 recorded as 25 less 27. “Here, the author proposed two preconditions for producing such” difference "