论文部分内容阅读
合同在裁判中处于法官找法的法源地位。把合同作为法源所带来的是方法论上的意义,它提供了合同进入法官思维与裁判过程的一个渠道,这个渠道不仅使合同在司法三段论的大小前提中有了分开的可能性,从而使裁判者可以获悉一个清晰的思维路径与一些确定的裁判方法;而且与法源紧连的诸种法律方法必然使司法克制主义成为裁判的主题。这在推动司法裁判走向确定性的同时,亦表达了法官在“私人立法者”及其意思自治面前的谦抑性。
The contract is in the position of legal source for judges to find ways in the referee. It is the methodological meaning brought about by the contract as a source of law, which provides a channel for the contract to enter the process of judge’s thinking and adjudication. This channel not only makes the contract separate in the size and the premise of the judicial syllogism, The referee can learn a clear path of thinking and certain methods of adjudication. Moreover, various legal methods connected with the source of law must make judicial restraint the subject of refereeing. While pushing judicial referenda toward certainty, it also expresses the judges’ restraint in the face of the “private legislator” and its autonomy of purpose.