本文将研究在1988年企业法的背景下,国营大中型企业的结构工资改革.有证据表明,在88年企业法中提出的一整套改革没有获得完全成功.本文的基本目的是利用委托一代理理论来分析这些改革的失败.委托一代理在这里并不是用来描述现存的中国企业,而是用以解释改革是如何失败的以及为什么失败.根据这一分析,我们还提供了一些特别的和可行的建议,使88年企业法如何能在未来取得成功.在由价格和利润表明稀缺性的市场中,产权的建立是市场发挥功能的一个必要条件.在计划经济下,为了使改革取得成效,企业内部和外部 This paper will study the structural wage reform of state-owned large and medium-sized enterprises in the context of the 1988 corporate law. There is evidence that the entire set of reforms proposed in the 88th year of the corporate law has not been fully successful. The basic purpose of this paper is to use commissions and agencies. Theoretical analysis of the failure of these reforms. Entrusting an agency is not used here to describe existing Chinese companies, but to explain how the reform failed and why it failed. Based on this analysis, we also provided some special and The feasible proposal will enable the 88-year enterprise law to succeed in the future. In a market where prices and profits indicate scarcity, establishment of property rights is a necessary condition for the market to function. Under the planned economy, in order to make the reform effective , internal and external