论文部分内容阅读
目的：比较丁咯地尔与脉络宁治疗脑梗死的疗效。方法：６０例脑梗死病人，其中３０例采用丁咯地尔２００ｍｇ加入５％葡萄糖注射液５００ｍＬ，静脉滴注（静滴），ｑｄ，１４ｄ为一个疗程。另３０例为对照组，采用脉络宁２０ｍＬ加入５％葡萄糖注射液５００ｍＬ，静滴，ｑｄ，１４ｄ为一个疗程。结果：丁咯地尔组总有效率８７％，显效率６３％。脉络宁组总有效率６４％，显效率３０％（Ｐ＜０．０５）。丁咯地尔对脑循环动力学有显著改善（Ｐ＜０．０１）。该药不良反应较少。结论：丁咯地尔治疗脑梗死的疗效优于脉络宁。
Objective: To compare the efficacy of buflomedil and Mailuoning in treating cerebral infarction. Methods: 60 patients with cerebral infarction, of which 30 cases of buflomedil 200mg added 5% glucose injection 500mL, intravenous infusion (intravenous drip), qd, 14d for a course of treatment. The other 30 cases as control group, the Mailuoning 20mL adding 5% glucose injection 500mL, intravenous drip, qd, 14d for a course of treatment. Results: Buflomedil group, the total effective rate was 87%, markedly effective rate of 63%. Mailuoning group total effective rate 64%, markedly efficient 30% (P <0.05). Buflomedil had a significant improvement in cerebral circulation kinetics (P <0.01). The drug adverse reactions less. Conclusion: Buflomedil is superior to Mailuoning in the treatment of cerebral infarction.