论文部分内容阅读
今天,传统国学教育异军突起,不仅社会和学校兴起读经讲经的热潮,众多大学也纷纷设立类似“国学院”等传统学术教学科研机构,对此,赞成欢呼者有之,反对谩骂者已然不少。后者之中,来自哲学界尤其是主张启蒙哲学的观点最为引人注目。在他们看来,无论是读经还是其他形式的国学教育和研究,在一定程度上都是一种历史的倒退等等。无独有偶,晚清之时,王国维就曾经基于启蒙哲学立场对张之洞的经学教育提出过严厉的批评。回顾这一段哲学与经学之争的历史,或许对于深入认识目前的争论有所助益。
Today, with the sudden emergence of traditional Chinese studies education, not only the society and schools have been on the rise of the study of the Bible, but many universities have set up such traditional academic teaching and research institutes as the “National Academy”. In favor of those who cheer, those who oppose abusiveness have not less. Among the latter, the most striking is the view from philosophical circles, especially those advocating enlightenment philosophy. In their view, both the study of the Bible and other forms of Guoxue education and research are, to a certain extent, a historical retrogression and so on. Coincidentally, in the late Qing Dynasty, Wang Guowei had once severely criticized Zhang Zhidong’s Confucian classics education based on the philosophical position of enlightenment. A review of the history of this struggle between philosophy and Confucianism may be helpful in understanding the current controversy.