论文部分内容阅读
长期以来,史学界对光绪帝的评价众说纷纭。50年代时,范文澜在《中国近代史》一书中提出:光绪帝是满洲皇族中比较能接受新思想的青年皇帝,颇想有所作为,称赞他:全部接受维新派的建议,有高度的变法决心。封建皇帝变成维新元首,是值得尊崇的,变法失败并不损害他在历史上的地位。但大部分人则强调光绪帝是剥削阶级代表人物,认为光绪帝在维新变法中没有同意维新派君主立宪的主张,与维新派是“同床异梦。”1980年以来,史学界有些人认为,以前对光绪帝的评价偏低了,应客观、公正地肯
For a long time, historians have different opinions on the evaluation of Emperor Guangxu. In the 1950s, Fan Wenlan put forward in his book “Modern Chinese History”: Emperor Guangxu, a young emperor in Manchu royal family who was more able to accept new ideas, did something quite good and praised him: all accepted the suggestions of the reformers and had a high degree of The determination of change. The feudal emperors became leaders of reform and reformation, which is worthy of respect. Failure to change the law did not undermine his position in history. However, most people emphasize that Emperor Guangxu is the representative of the exploiting class, that the Emperor Guangxu did not agree with the reformist monarchy in reform and reform, and that the reformists were “the same bed and the same dream.” Since 1980, Emperor’s evaluation is low, should be objective and fair to Ken