论文部分内容阅读
在对《阴符经》文本的发生、所指、主旨与理境问题上,刘处玄奉持内丹修仙立场,从信仰实证、揭示秘隐、纳道入炁和内丹修炼的向度,对《阴符经》进行了全真道式的诠释;朱熹则持守内圣成德立场,从知识考证、窥测天道、纳道入理和内圣修养的向度,对《阴符经》进行了理学式诠释。对两者的对比研究,可以有助于我们更好地理解儒家文化与道家、道教文化之间的深层关联,明晰朱熹理学所具有的以儒释道面向。
Liu Xuanxuan holds the position of cultivating immortality in the Inner Almighty in the context of the occurrence, meaning, purpose and environment of the text of the Yin-Fu Scriptures. From the empirical evidence of faith, he reveals the dimensions of the practice of secret, natal and inner alchemy. “Yin Fu Jing” conducted a full authentic interpretations; Zhu Xi holds the position of virtue, from the knowledge of the textual research, peeping Heaven, Nadao management and internal sanctification of the direction of the “Yin Fu Jing” The science of interpretation. A comparative study of the two can help us to better understand the deep relationship between Confucianism and Taoism and Taoism and clarify the Confucianism, Buddhism and Taoism which Zhu Xi’s Neo-Confucianism possesses.