受葛洪义教授的嘱托,我对今天的讨论略予评议。在认真听完四位的发言后,我不仅感到一种智性的压力、知性的困惑,同时并有一种感性的压力,使得我一边听讲,一边做记录时踌躇再三。那么,为什么会有一种智性压力和知性压力呢?刚才陈金钊教授的发言不乏精彩之处。从五月份在威海召开的全国“法律推理与法律论证”讨论会,到今天的研讨会,陈教授就此作了两次发言,我感觉,其研究有所深化。陈教授从五个方面解释什么是法律解释。的确,法律解释的缘由,在于法律之为一种规则,而与事实构成了一种特定的关系。我们如何能知道我们所要阐 On the excuse given by Professor Ge Hongyi, I comment a little on today’s discussion. Having listened carefully to the four statements, I not only felt a kind of intellectual pressure, intellectual confusion, but also a kind of emotional pressure that made me hesitate while listening. Why, then, is there a kind of intellectual pressure and intellectual pressure? Professor Chen Jinzhao said there is no lack of brilliant points. From the seminar entitled “Legal Reasoning and Legal Argument” convened in May in Weihai, to this seminar, Professor Chen made two speeches in this regard. I feel that his research has been deepened. Professor Chen explains what is legal explanation from five aspects. Indeed, the reason for legal interpretation lies in the law as a rule, but with the facts constitute a specific relationship. How can we know what we want to explain