此文以一种创新性的测算方法,重新估算了中国36个大中城市的相对消费价格指数。该方法矫正了现有文献的三大偏差:1)样本数据中市场化服务品的代表样本不足,2)使用的消费权重严重失真,以及3)样本数据分类与计算权重不匹配,从而得到了更为准确、合理的测算结果,由此计算出的城市实际收入水平也更为可靠。基于这些测算结果,此文发现,唐翔(2008,2010)提出的“国内宾大效应”在中国的确存在,即人口规模、价格水平、名义收入、实际收入、人力资本等五个指标在中国城市间具有显著的正相关关系。此文的结论、方法和测算结果对于中国的区域经济、城市经济、房地产市场等多个领域的学术研究和政策实践都有重要的参考价值。 This article re-estimates the relative CPIs of 36 cities in China using an innovative measure. This approach corrects for the three major biases in the current literature: 1) insufficient sample representation of marketable services in sample data, 2) severe distortion of consumer weights used, and 3) mismatch between sample data classification and calculated weights, resulting in More accurate and reasonable measurement results, calculated from the actual level of urban income is more reliable. Based on these measurement results, this paper finds that Tang Bin (2008,2010) proposed “domestic Penn effect ” does exist in China, namely the five indicators of population size, price level, nominal income, real income, human capital There is a significant positive correlation between Chinese cities. The conclusions, methods and results of this paper have important reference value for academic research and policy practice in many fields such as regional economy, urban economy and real estate market in China.