论文部分内容阅读
目的:对16例腕关节外伤患者的X线平片、CT及三维CT3种检查进行对比研究,评估在临床诊断中的价值.材料与方法:16例中,男8例,女8例,平均年龄41岁.全部病例均经X线平片、常规CT和三维CT成像,X线平片包括常规位置和特殊位置.CT机为SOMATOMCRF.结果:16例中X线平片阳性15例18处,阴性1例.CT及三维CT全部阳性,共发现骨折及脱位32处.其中腕部复杂性骨折合并脱位10例,多发性骨折不合并脱位2例,单纯性骨折4例.16例中10例开放复位手术证实,4例手法复位,2例单纯石膏托固定治愈证实.结论:在腕关节外伤X线检查中,平片占有重要地位,CT优于平片,三维CT是平片和CT不可代替的补充“,”Objective: To evaluate plainfilm, CT and 3D CT in the diagnosing of wrist trauma by a comparison study in 16 cases.Materials and Methods:Plainfilm, routine CT and 3D CT were performed in 16 cases. The findings on different images were analyzed and compared.Results:All cases showed positive findings on CT and 3D CT, and the same was true for plainfilm except one case which showed no fracture sign. Fractures and dislocations were found in 32 sites altogether, including complicated wrist fractures with dislocation (n=10), multiple fractures without dislocation (n=2) and simple fractures (n=4). Of 16 cases, 10 were confirmed by open reduction, 4 by manual reduction and 2 by plaster support cure.Conclusion: This study indicates that the plainfilm plays an important role in the examination of wrist trauma, though CT is superior to it, while 3D CT is a helpful supplement to them.